Supreme Court upholds death penalty while mandating life imprisonment as the norm
Why in news: The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty in the Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) case while mandating life imprisonment as the standard norm.
The Supreme Court ruled that death sentences should only be imposed for 'special reasons' where life imprisonment is 'unquestionably foreclosed.' The ruling requires courts to weigh the circumstances of the crime against the personal circumstances of the accused.
Prelims pointers (3)
- BodySupreme Court of India: The highest judicial body in India.
- FactBachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980): The landmark case upholding the death penalty.
- FactLife imprisonment: Mandated as the norm for criminal sentencing under judicial discretion.
Mains angle
Q. Critically examine the judicial guidelines for imposing the death penalty in India and discuss the balance between retributive justice and the right to life.
- Judicial discretion: Balancing the gravity of the crime against the individual's personal circumstances.
- Constitutional conflict: Reconciling the 'Right to Life' under Article 21 with the state's power to impose capital punishment.
Keywords: Judicial Discretion · Retributive Justice · Article 21 · Capital Punishment · Rule of Law