सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

Union government contemplates policy framework to tackle child pornography and non-consensual explicit content

GS3Economy · S&T · Environment · Security· Cyber security· Prelims + Mains·

Intermediary liability and cyber governance: a relevant GS3 Internal Security and Ethics case study.

Why in news

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Supreme Court that the Union government is contemplating a policy framework to tackle child pornography and non-consensual explicit content.

Background

The proposed framework aims to address dysfunctional safeguards against sexual assault videos. The law may specifically impose liability on intermediaries for hosting or facilitating such content.

Facts for Prelims

  • PostTushar Mehta: Solicitor General of India
  • BodySupreme Court of India: Led by Chief Justice Surya Kant
  • FactThe proposed law may impose liability on intermediaries for non-consensual explicit content

Prelims practice question

With reference to the proposed policy framework to tackle child pornography and non-consensual explicit content, consider the following statements:

  1. The proposed law may impose liability on the judiciary for hosting such content.
  2. The Union government is contemplating this framework to tackle child pornography.
  3. The framework aims to address dysfunctional safeguards against sexual assault videos.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a)1 only
  2. (b)2 only
  3. (c)1 and 2 only
  4. (d)2 and 3 only
Show answer

Answer: (d) 2 and 3 only — Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 1 is incorrect: The law may specifically impose liability on intermediaries.

For Mains

Q. Discuss the legal and technological challenges in holding digital intermediaries liable for the dissemination of non-consensual explicit content and child pornography in India.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • Liability paradox: Balancing intermediary accountability with the protection of end-to-end encryption
  • Enforcement gap: Difficulty in identifying and prosecuting anonymous perpetrators across decentralized platforms
  • Regulatory friction: Conflict between rapid content moderation and the fundamental right to freedom of speech

Keywords: intermediary liability · digital forensics · non-consensual explicit content · cyber governance · child pornography

Read the full news →Report a mistake in this noteHow notes are madeSource: The Hindu ↗Also: GS2 · Bills, Acts & ordinancesAlso: GS2 · Vulnerable sections (SC/ST, minorities, disabled, elderly, children)

More Internal Security notes

All Internal Security current affairs →

Something wrong, or something missing?

Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.

Report a mistake →Ask for something →[email protected]

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.