सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

India slams Pakistan at UN for sponsoring terrorism and killing civilians in Kashmir

GS2Polity · Governance · IR· India's bilateral relations· Prelims·

Multilateral diplomacy and cross-border terrorism: a key GS2 International Relations topic.

Why in news

India delivered a Right of Reply at the UN General Assembly Fourth Committee, accusing Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism and human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir.

Background

Mahima Kumari Mewar led a delegation of 15 Members of Parliament to the UN General Assembly Fourth Committee on October 9, 2026. India demanded that Pakistan cease human rights violations and the killing of civilians in illegally occupied areas.

Part of a topic

📚 India-Pakistan Relations · 41 notes →

Every note on this topic, the basics and practice questions on one page.

Facts for Prelims

  • PlaceJammu and Kashmir: Region where India accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism and human rights violations.
  • BodyUN General Assembly Fourth Committee: The forum where India delivered its Right of Reply.
  • FactA delegation of 15 Members of Parliament accompanied Mahima Kumari Mewar to the UN.

Prelims practice question

With reference to India's recent diplomatic actions at the UN, consider the following statements:

  1. India accused Pakistan of human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir.
  2. A delegation of 20 Members of Parliament accompanied Mahima Kumari Mewar to the UN.
  3. India delivered a Right of Reply at the UN General Assembly Fourth Committee.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a)2 only
  2. (b)1 and 2 only
  3. (c)1 and 3 only
  4. (d)1, 2 and 3
Show answer

Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only — Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect: The note states a delegation of 15 Members of Parliament accompanied her.

For Mains

Q. Discuss the significance of multilateral forums like the UN in addressing cross-border terrorism and the challenges of enforcing international human rights norms.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • Diplomatic friction: Conflict between India's security narrative and Pakistan's claims at the UN
  • Institutional limitation: Difficulty of the UN in enforcing punitive measures against state-sponsored terrorism
  • Human rights paradox: Balancing national security imperatives with international human rights obligations in contested territories

Keywords: cross-border terrorism · multilateral diplomacy · sovereignty · human rights violations · Right of Reply

Read the full news →Report a mistake in this noteHow notes are madeSource: The Hindu ↗Also: GS3 · Terrorism & insurgency (J&K, North-East)

More International Relations notes

All International Relations current affairs →

Something wrong, or something missing?

Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.

Report a mistake →Ask for something →[email protected]

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.