
Has the US Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act – and how? | Civil Rights News
The US Supreme Court ruled that a Louisiana electoral map was unconstitutional, effectively weakening the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The court's 6-3 decision found that the map, which created two Black-majority congressional districts, relied too heavily on race and violated the Constitution's prohibition against intentional racial discrimination. The ruling is seen as a victory for Louisiana Republicans and President Donald Trump, who had supported the challenge to the Voting Rights Act. The decision could have far-reaching implications for redistricting efforts nationwide, potentially allowing state legislatures to redraw electoral maps in ways that dilute minority voting power. Legal experts warn that this ruling may weaken protections established by the Voting Rights Act and allow partisan manipulation of congressional districts.
30 APR 2026
· THIS STORY — Al Jazeera
The US Supreme Court ruled that a Louisiana electoral map was unconstitutional, effectively weakening the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
— The Guardian
The Supreme Court's ruling in Louisiana v. Callais led Louisiana's secretary of state to suspend House primaries due to the need for congressional map redrawing.
4 MAY 2026
— The Guardian
The US Supreme Court expedited its ruling on a Louisiana congressional map case, allowing for the implementation of a decision that gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
To respect publishing rights, SatyaDheesh does not host full copyrighted news copy. You can read the complete article on the publisher's platform: