Cash-for-query case: Supreme Court stays Delhi HC order on sanction for CBI to try Mahua Moitra
GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Judiciary & landmark judgments· Prelims + Mains·
Why in news
The Supreme Court stayed a Delhi High Court order allowing the Lokpal to consider granting sanction for the CBI to prosecute MP Mahua Moitra in a 'cash-for-query' scam.
Background
The Supreme Court issued notices to MP Mahua Moitra, the CBI, and BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. The case involves allegations of exchanging Lok Sabha questions for cash and gifts from a businessman.
Facts for Prelims
- FactThe Delhi High Court's original order regarding the sanction was issued in December 2025.
For Mains
Q. Examine the institutional role of the Lokpal and the judiciary in ensuring accountability of Members of Parliament against allegations of corruption.
Dimensions to cover in your answer
- Procedural bottleneck: Delays in the sanctioning process affecting the timely filing of charge sheets by the CBI.
- Judicial oversight: Balancing the independence of investigative agencies with the protection of parliamentary privileges.
Keywords: Accountability · Parliamentary Privileges · Judicial Review · Anti-corruption · Rule of Law
More Polity & Constitution notes
- T.N. Assembly’s annual sitting days declined from 64 in the first term to 32 in the 16th: PRS study · 19 March 2026
- What does passed in ‘Guillotine’ mean in parliament? · 19 March 2026
- Are publication of books, manufacture of prasadam by temples an industrial activity, Supreme Court asks · 18 March 2026
- ₹42.65 crore-worth cash, goods seized in T.N. as part of poll monitoring till March 18: ECI · 18 March 2026
- ECI reshuffles 13 IAS officers in West Bengal, appoints DM-cum-DEOs ahead of Assembly polls · 18 March 2026
- A polling booth in Tamil Nadu stands out with just 5 voters · 15 March 2026
This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.