SC ruling to supply 11,973 million units of electricity could generate ₹20,000 crore
GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Federalism & Centre-State relations· Prelims + Mains·
Inter-state power sharing and judicial intervention: a GS2 case study on Cooperative Federalism.
Why in news
The Supreme Court directed Punjab and Haryana to supply 11,973 million units of electricity to Himachal Pradesh over 20 years to settle a dispute over the state's 7.19% share in hydroelectric projects.
Background
The Supreme Court ruling mandates the supply of 11,973 million units of electricity over a 20-year period. Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu stated this settlement could generate between ₹10,000 crore and ₹20,000 crore in revenue for the state.
Facts for Prelims
- FactThe Supreme Court directed a supply of 11,973 million units of electricity over a 20-year period.
- FactThe dispute concerns Himachal Pradesh's 7.19% share in hydroelectric projects.
- PlaceThe ruling involves the states of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, and Haryana.
Prelims practice question
With reference to the Supreme Court ruling on electricity supply between states, consider the following statements:
- The ruling involves the states of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, and Haryana.
- The Supreme Court directed the supply of 11,973 million units of electricity over a 20-year period.
- The dispute concerns Himachal Pradesh's 10% share in hydroelectric projects.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a)2 only
- (b)1 and 2 only
- (c)1 and 3 only
- (d)1, 2 and 3
Show answer
Answer: (b) 1 and 2 only — Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect: The dispute concerns Himachal Pradesh's 7.19% share.
For Mains
Q. Discuss the significance of inter-state power sharing agreements in fostering cooperative federalism and regional economic development in India.
Dimensions to cover in your answer
- Revenue mobilization: Potential for ₹10,000-₹20,000 crore revenue to fund Himachal Pradesh's infrastructure and public services.
- Inter-state cooperation: Judicial intervention to resolve hydroelectric project share disputes between neighboring states.
- Resource distribution: Balancing regional energy demands with equitable distribution of hydroelectric power generation.
Keywords: Cooperative Federalism · Inter-state disputes · Hydroelectric projects · Revenue generation · Judicial intervention
More Polity & Constitution notes
- Calcutta High Court halts Kolkata Municipal Corporation election notifications pending ward delimitation petition · 7 November 2026
- Priyank Kharge orders priority filling of vacant Kalyana Karnataka posts via Karnataka Examinations Authority · 6 November 2026
- ECI to provide another opportunity for ASDD electors in 7 States · 6 November 2026
- The Supreme Court accepted the Centre's proposal on Friday to settle energy dues between · 6 November 2026
- Bombay High Court: Removing elector's name without hearing denies right to vote · 6 November 2026
- Supreme Court rules OBC non-creamy layer judgment will not apply retrospectively · 6 November 2026
Something wrong, or something missing?
Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.
This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.