With reference to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, consider the following statements: 1. The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a process specifically for the National Capital. 2. The Supreme Court ruled that Forms 6, 7, and 8 can be modified by the ECI. 3. The ECI was given a two-week deadline to remove cut-off dates for re-inclusion in the Delhi SIR. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Supreme Court orders ECI to extend deadlines and simplify enrolment for Delhi SIR

GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Elections, ECI & electoral reforms· Prelims + Mains· 28 October 2026

Judicial oversight on electoral roll revision: a GS2 Polity and Governance case study.

Why in news

The Supreme Court ordered the Election Commission of India (ECI) to extend deadlines and simplify the enrolment process for the Delhi Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

Background

The Supreme Court bench comprising CJI Surya Kant, J. Joymalya Bagchi, and J.V. Mohana ruled that Forms 6, 7, and 8 cannot be changed. The ECI was given two weeks to remove cut-off dates for re-inclusion in the Delhi SIR.

Facts for Prelims

BodyECI: Election Commission of India is the body responsible for electoral roll revisions.
FactForms 6, 7, and 8: Specific forms used in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process.
PlaceDelhi SIR: Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls specifically for the National Capital.
FactTwo-week deadline: Timeframe given by the Supreme Court to the ECI to remove cut-off dates.

Prelims practice question

With reference to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, consider the following statements:

The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a process specifically for the National Capital.
The Supreme Court ruled that Forms 6, 7, and 8 can be modified by the ECI.
The ECI was given a two-week deadline to remove cut-off dates for re-inclusion in the Delhi SIR.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a)1 only
(b)1 and 2 only
(c)1 and 3 only
(d)2 and 3 only

Show answer

Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only — Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect: The Supreme Court ruled that Forms 6, 7, and 8 cannot be changed.

For Mains

Q. Examine the importance of accurate and inclusive electoral rolls in ensuring the integrity of the democratic process in India.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

Administrative hurdle: Complexity in distinguishing between permanent shifts and temporary movements in electoral data
Procedural fairness: Ensuring voters who miss initial deadlines are not disenfranchised by arbitrary cut-off dates

Keywords: Electoral Roll · Right to Vote · Judicial Oversight · Administrative Transparency · Special Intensive Revision

Read the full news →Report a mistake in this note How notes are made Source: The Hindu ↗

More Polity & Constitution notes

Supreme Court rules Election Commission cannot alter Forms 6, 7, and 8 · 28 October 2026
EC appoints 11 nodal officers for Manipur Assembly polls in February-March next year · 28 October 2026
Delhi Assembly Speaker proposes 30-day minimum annual sitting for Indian legislatures · 28 October 2026
Ladakh administration rolls back Excise Policy 2026–27 after six days of women's protests · 28 October 2026
21 news publishers challenge Modi’s privacy law in Supreme Court over pre-censorship fears · 27 October 2026
Supreme Court defers hearing on ECI records excluding 13 crore voters · 27 October 2026

All Polity & Constitution current affairs →

Something wrong, or something missing?

Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.

Report a mistake →Ask for something →[email protected]

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.