सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

Karnataka rejects Tamil Nadu's 18.402 tmcft water demand citing drought in 226 taluks

GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Health policy & public health· Prelims + Mains·

Inter-state water disputes and federal resource allocation: a GS2 and GS3 case study.

Why in news

Karnataka rejected Tamil Nadu's demand for 18.402 tmcft of Cauvery water, citing a 55.35% inflow deficit and drought in 226 taluks to prioritize drinking water.

Background

The Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC) directed Karnataka to ensure a 3,000 cusecs water flow at Biligundlu for 15 days starting October 24. The Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) endorsed this during its 60th meeting.

Facts for Prelims

  • FactKarnataka cited a 55.35% inflow deficit in the Cauvery river.
  • FactTamil Nadu demanded 18.402 tmcft of water from the Cauvery.
  • FactCWRC directed a 3,000 cusecs water flow at Biligundlu for 15 days.
  • BodyCWMA (Cauvery Water Management Authority) endorsed the flow during its 60th meeting.

Prelims practice question

With reference to the Cauvery water dispute, consider the following statements:

  1. The CWMA endorsed a water flow of 5,000 cusecs at Biligundlu.
  2. Karnataka cited a 55.35% inflow deficit in the Cauvery river to justify its decision.
  3. Tamil Nadu demanded 18.402 tmcft of water from the Cauvery river.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a)3 only
  2. (b)1 and 3 only
  3. (c)2 and 3 only
  4. (d)1, 2 and 3
Show answer

Answer: (c) 2 and 3 only — Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 1 is incorrect: The CWMA endorsed a 3,000 cusecs water flow.

For Mains

Q. Discuss the challenges in inter-state water sharing in India and the role of regulatory bodies in balancing ecological sustainability with regional demands.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • Inter-state friction: Conflict between drinking water priorities and agricultural irrigation demands
  • Data asymmetry: Challenges in establishing objective inflow deficit metrics for water allocation
  • Institutional oversight: Role of CWRC and CWMA in mediating federal water disputes

Keywords: Inter-state water dispute · Water scarcity · Federalism · Resource allocation · Cauvery River

Read the full news →Report a mistake in this noteHow notes are madeSource: The Hindu ↗Also: GS2 · Federalism & Centre-State relations

More Social Justice notes

All Social Justice current affairs →

Something wrong, or something missing?

Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.

Report a mistake →Ask for something →[email protected]

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.