सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

Bombay High Court rules Special Intensive Revision draft roll cannot delete voter names

GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Elections, ECI & electoral reforms· Prelims + Mains·

Procedural fairness and the right to be heard: a GS2 case study on democratic inclusion and administrative law.

Why in news

The Bombay High Court ruled that the Special Intensive Revision draft roll cannot be used to delete voter names without providing hearings to the affected individuals.

Background

A Division Bench of Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar and Justice Valmiki Menees ruled on September 30, 2026, against the Election Commission of India. The court found that Paresh Salgaonkar and five family members were wrongly removed because the ERONET software rejected their Form 8 applications.

Facts for Prelims

  • BodyERONET: Software used by the Election Commission of India for voter list management
  • FactForm 8: The specific application form used for voter registration/correction that was rejected in this case
  • PlaceBombay High Court: The judicial body that issued the ruling on September 30, 2026

Prelims practice question

Which software is used by the Election Commission for processing electoral data?

  1. (a)VoterID
  2. (b)SVEEP
  3. (c)ERONET
  4. (d)SAMS
Show answer

Answer: (c) ERONET — The note identifies ERONET as the software used by the Election Commission for processing electoral data.

For Mains

Q. Examine the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard in the maintenance of electoral rolls by the Election Commission of India.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • Technological bias: Risk of automated software errors (ERONET) leading to arbitrary disenfranchisement
  • Due process: Necessity of mandatory hearings before removing names from voter lists to uphold democratic rights

Keywords: procedural fairness · electoral integrity · disenfranchisement · judicial oversight · administrative transparency

Read the full news →Report a mistake in this noteSource: The Hindu ↗

More Polity & Constitution notes

All Polity & Constitution current affairs →

Something wrong, or something missing?

Spotted a mistake in a note, or want a topic, format or PDF that would help your preparation? Write to us. We read every mail and fix errors fast.

Report a mistake →Ask for something →[email protected]

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.