SC rules against complete Delhi Metro prohibition to balance safety with commuter rights
Why in news: The Supreme Court ruled against a complete prohibition of the Delhi Metro during protests, ordering authorities to balance public safety with the rights of commuters.
The Supreme Court heard arguments from the Centre and CPI(M) General Secretary MA Baby regarding security for a Cockroach Janta Party protest. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta alleged that 200 personnel were injured in July and a policewoman was nearly molested during a Congress agitation.
Prelims pointers (1)
- Fact200 personnel were allegedly injured during a protest in July.
Mains angle
Q. Discuss the judicial balancing act between the state's power to maintain public order and the fundamental rights of citizens to freedom of movement and assembly.
- Constitutional conflict: Balancing Article 19(1)(b) right to assemble with the state's duty to ensure public safety.
- Administrative discretion: Determining the threshold for 'complete prohibition' versus 'regulated access' in public transport.
- Security infrastructure: Challenges in managing large-scale agitations in high-density transit hubs.
Keywords: Proportionality · Public Order · Fundamental Rights · Judicial Review · Commuter Rights