सत्याधीशसत्याधीश
SatyaDheesh
India's Ground Truth Record
Pull to refresh
VOL. I · EST. 11.2025 
SatyaDheesh
सत्याधीश
India's Ground Truth Record
LIVE

Can a UK-style judicial review mechanism save India from UAPA?

GS2Polity · Governance · IR· Judiciary & landmark judgments· Prelims + Mains·

Why in news

The Supreme Court highlighted the low conviction rate and lack of fair judicial review under the UAPA, prompting a debate on adopting a UK-style judicial review mechanism.

Background

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) was enacted in 1967 to combat terrorism and unlawful activities. The UK's Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC) serves as a model for independent review of organizations banned by the state.

Facts for Prelims

  • Act / BillUAPA: Enacted in 1967 to provide for the prevention of unlawful activities and terrorism.
  • BodyPOAC: A UK-based independent body that reviews the government's decision to proscribe organizations.
  • FactUAPA is characterized by a historically low conviction rate despite high-profile arrests.

For Mains

Q. Critically examine the need for a structured judicial review mechanism for proscribed organizations under the UAPA to balance national security with the principles of natural justice.

Dimensions to cover in your answer

  • Due process deficit: Lack of access to government evidence by proscribed entities hinders meaningful legal defense.
  • Procedural safeguards: Need for independent legal advocates to ensure fair representation against state-led allegations.

Keywords: Natural Justice · Proportionality · Judicial Oversight · Due Process · Rule of Law

Read the full news →Source: Indian Express ↗Also: GS3 · Terrorism & insurgency (J&K, North-East)

More Polity & Constitution notes

All Polity & Constitution current affairs →

This note is generated automatically from SatyaDheesh's news feed and mapped to the UPSC CSE syllabus. Check facts against the original report or PIB before using them in an answer.